UPCOMING JVET EVENTS…

Meet the 250th Edition event panel

Leesa Wheelahan

Stephanie Allais

Simon McGrath

Debate one: The Capabilities Approach, chaired by Simon McGrath

Leesa Wheelahan

The human development and capability approach provides a normative framework for evaluating vocational education policies and practices, and for considering alternatives. It calls attention to human flourishing rather than instrumental concerns about investment in human capital. The capabilities approach cannot be applied in the absence of theorising about social relations of power and domination, but it can provide a framework for positing alternative aims of vocational education that focus on human flourishing. In particular, the capabilities approach provides the grounds for considering whose interests are served by vocational education, the extent to which it meets students’ interests, and the resources that are needed to ensure these interests are met.

Stephanie Allais

The capabilities approach makes an important, although difficult to implement, contribution to economic debates, by drawing attention firstly to economic outcomes beyond growth, and secondly to individual differences in what is valued most. But the current widespread application of it in education research is problematic. The term ‘capabilities’ lends itself to thinking about attributes of individuals, instead of societies. In education, this is aggravated by the fact that education systems are set up to cultivate and develop attributes in individuals. Much work in this tradition then focuses on the attributes that individuals need, as opposed to how societies should change. It is frequently juxtaposed with the human capital approach, but it has more in common with it than difference: both position VET as an independent variable that will lead to hoped for changes in individuals, and these will, it is hoped, enable them to gain productive employment and earn well (HCT) or to ‘flourish’ (capabilities). The capabilities approach could lead to ever greater burdens placed on weak VET systems that already are expected to produce miracles; now, not only should they produce work-ready individuals, but also individuals who can flourish in ways of their choosing. This may, paradoxically, reinforce victim-blaming both of individuals and education institutions.

Debate Two: Institutional Theory, chaired by Moses Oketch

Books launch

David Guile presents Beyond Skills: A Capability Conception of Vocational Education, by Leesa Wheelahan and Gavin Moodie, published by Brill/SENSE.

This book argues that a new ‘social settlement’ is needed in vocational education, one which is based on a broader understanding of occupations and preparation for work. It argues for more expansive understandings of the purposes of vocational education which includes support for human flourishing, social justice, social inclusion, and sustainability.

Emancipation and vocational education: Skills, Bildung and the subject, by Bill Esmond, Johannes Schmees, and Volker Wedekind, published by Routledge. Speaker to be confirmed.

This book challenges the economistic neoliberal rationale for vocational education, drawing critically on neglected bodies of theory, especially from Germany but also the global South, to explore the possibilities for critical thinking and emancipatory practice within vocational space.

Markus Maurer

An institutionalist theory approach is productive for researching vocational education and training (VET) because it treats skills systems not just as education arrangements, but as embedded in labour markets, firms, states, and production regimes. Within this broad family of approaches, historical institutionalism has become particularly influential in comparative VET research, as it highlights how skills systems are shaped by historically developed institutional configurations rather than by policy design alone. Yet, historical institutionalism foregrounds not only path dependency and critical junctures, but also processes of gradual institutional change. Such a perspective can enable researchers to understand VET systems as outcomes of negotiated settlements and evolving institutional paths, and to develop more realistic reform perspectives that engage with incentives, coalitions, and institutional change rather than assuming that improved policy design alone can fix the system.

Bill Esmond

Institutional theories have attracted interest in our field because of their recognition that skill formation systems in each country possess their own rationalities and ecologies: they appear to offer possibilities to resist the convergence of VET on neoliberal lines. Yet in discarding established understandings of social structures such as class, gender and ‘race’, these mid-level theories neglect the active engagement in national skills policies of powerful social forces whose aims centre on maintaining social hierarchy and deepening accelerating inequalities. They overlook the significance of educational practices that support social justice within VET and their need to connect to broader social forces that can support the world's youth towards meaningful work and a sustainable humanity.

Markus Maurer

Bill Esmond

Moses Oketch

Open call for papers:

“International perspectives on academisation, tertiarisation and hybridisation of vocational education: Between problem-solving, imitation and/or unintended consequences”

Guest Editors: 

Junmin Li, TU Dortmund University; Germany
Johannes K. Schmees, University of Derby, United Kingdom
Ann-Marie Bathmaker, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

Cooperative universities in Germany, higher and degree apprenticeships in the United Kingdom, Associate Degrees in the Netherlands and vocational universities in China. These developments manifest a significant trend of academisation, tertiarisation and hybridisation of vocational education and, in consequence, reshape traditional boundaries between vocational and higher education.

This proposed special issue will offer a comprehensive critical examination of the evolving landscape of academisation, tertiarisation and hybridisation of vocational education. Building on Criblez (2010), we define the tertiarisation of vocational education as a process whereby vocational qualifications are developed at tertiary level without acquiring academic status. Tertiarisation aims to elevate the status of vocational education, enhance the attractiveness of vocational pathways, and increase the social and economic benefits associated with them (Deißinger & Ott, 2016).  Click below to read the full call.

Deadline for 500 word abstracts - 29 May 2026